Re: More on Kokunimasa


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Ukiyo-e Q & A ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Hans van ter Toolen on December 21, 2001 at 08:32:29:

In Reply to: Re: More on Kokunimasa posted by John Fiorillo on December 21, 2001 at 08:17:58:

: Hans Olof and Hans,

: Yes, I think Hans Olof is correct. I read the first character as 'shô' but its alternate reading, 'ko', should be used in this particular signature . It seems that in Chaikin's book (The Sino-Japanese War), he also read it as 'shô' and then concluded that the primary name was Kunimasa, leading to the mistaken attribution. The Merritt and Yamada citation is the one to use.

: John

John, Hans Olof,

Many thanks for your help.

Hans


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Ukiyo-e Q & A ] [ FAQ ]